Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree
In Australia, Norway, Sweden and other Western nations, there is a distinct race-based crime in motion being ignored by the diversity police: Islamic men are raping Western women for ethnic reasons. We know this because the rapists have openly declared their sectarian motivations.
And earlier this year Australians were outraged when Lebanese Sheik Faiz Mohammed gave a lecture in Sydney where he informed his audience that rape victims had no one to blame but themselves. Women, he said, who wore skimpy clothing, invited men to rape them.
This column documents many instances of Muslims condoning the rape of non-muslims and makes a compelling case that this is an epidemic.
How come I don't see any rush to create new "hate crime" laws?
9 comments:
So ironic that Australia is considered a "Western" nation.
"How come I don't see any rush to create new 'hate crime' laws?"
Because European nations, in an even greater irony, tend to be more liberal than the United States. The idea that we shouldn't be punishing people for what's in their heads is having more of a struggle on this side of the Atlantic.
(Returned from a bit of a Christmas break, by the way, so I've responded to a few questions my side was asked in some past posts. One of your anonymouses, I recall, was quick to cowardize me for not answering him in the first IAotD, but it's there now.)
Kaelri, did you even RTFA, or are you just spouting off inanities for the heck of it?
Kaelri, I'm making fun of so-called "hate crimes" laws.
I'm pretty sure that most crimes are committed out of hate, as opposed to crimes committed out of love or compassion.
But other than the hate crimes issue I think that it's interesting how this story, and it is a story, is not getting reported in the media. Surely those journalists can blame Bush for these rapes somehow...
I have to respond to a comment you did in an earlier post Kaelri:
"I don't think you'll see any defense of the illegals that actually committed crimes beyond their walking over an arbitrary line in the dirt."
So does this mean that you don't approve of them working? (illegal) Or getting government benefits? (illegal)
What then should they do? Sleep on people's sofas all day and watch Oprah?
Illegal aliens must break multiple laws once they have come here illegaly. I've laid this out many times.
"Kaelri, did you even RTFA"
Skimmed it, yeah.
"Kaelri, I'm making fun of so-called "hate crimes" laws."
Oh. Well. I guess that by now I just sort of reflexively assume you to be in disagreement with most of the things in which I believe.
"Surely those journalists can blame Bush for these rapes somehow..."
Heh... judging from a few more recent revelations, I'd say the biased-liberal-MSM has been President Bush's very best friend for about a year now.
"So does this mean that you don't approve of them working? (illegal) Or getting government benefits? (illegal)"
Included in the crossing-arbitrary-line bit. Sorry, didn't think I needed to spell it out to someone as knowledgable on the topic as you. What I meant was that they aren't all amoral, as was Mr. Alvarezbriseno (what a name; his profile is the sole result for that name in a Google search). If I were in the role of an illegal immigrant - 'specially the kind that crosses the border regularly and frequently - I'd have a high enough blood pressure without screwing myself even more by committing crimes I didn't need to.
Women, he said, who wore skimpy clothing, invited men to rape them.
responsibility on both sides.
I do not make any excuses for men who decided to violate others'and that does not excuse women either.
a lot of Women's fashions for example are designed to "tease" if you will sexuality and being a woman, I will admit to purposely showing off a little to get the reaction from men.
is it right? probably not.
but it still no way "invites" someone to violate sombody else and those people that cannot control them selves... well I can't think of anything nice to say.
This is old news, BUT IS IT?
Portland, Oregon:
A Sleepy City or City of Sleepers
by Douglas J. Hagmann, Director
6 June 2005: Portland appears to be a city of many distinctions, not the least of which is that it is the home of the “Portland Seven,” referring to seven Portland area Islamic militants who were arrested and accused of conspiring to travel to Afghanistan to help the Taliban fight the U.S. military. Six of the defendants are serving prison terms of up to 18 years while the seventh was killed in an October 2003 shootout in Pakistan.
More recently, Portland achieved the distinction to be the first municipality in the nation to pull out of the Justice Department’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). Some called it a “rejection of President Bush’s politics of fear,” while more rational people have called it just plain stupid. I vote for the latter, especially in light of the events of this weekend in Multnomah County, Oregon.
Multnomah County Sheriff deputies caught two Muslim men, Abdullah Shabbaz and Jason Merrigan, a/k/a Yassin Abdurahman shooting assault rifles on Larch Mountain on Saturday, 28 May 2005. According to police reports, they also possessed a duffle bag containing semi-automatic assault rifles, handguns, clips and a gas mask, in addition to the assault rifles they were shooting. Both men were ticketed for trespassing and lying to authorities; Abdurahman (Merrigan) also had an outstanding warrant for a drug charge. In an interesting coincidence, the area where the two were shooting is a heavily wooded area near the Columbia River Gorge, just across the river from the gravel pit where some of the "Portland Seven" were found to be "target practicing" shortly before their arrest.
Portland: From the “City of Roses” to the “City of Guns & Roses?”
Portland has long been known as the “City of Roses.” Perhaps with the political grandstanding that led to the majority of Portland’s leaders nixing their interaction with the U.S. Justice Department, it will become known as the city of “Guns & Roses.” The stated cause for Portland’s pullout from the JTTF stems from the demand by Portland Mayor Tom Potter and Chief of Police Derrick Foxworth that they be granted the same “top secret” clearance as the Portland police officers assigned to the FBI directed Task Force. Absent of that, they reasoned, there would be no way to insure the JTTF operates within the bounds of Oregon law and the state Constitution.
In a news conference about the issue earlier this year, Robert Jordan, the FBI’s Special Agent in Charge (SAC) in Portland, stated that the demand is “not feasible or reasonable” since no other mayor in the 100 cities and towns with JTTF teams has been granted top secret clearance.
Apparently, though, the issue is a moot point if you would ask Portland city commissioner Randy Leonard. Written in an article on Portland’s own official website dated Tuesday, March 1, 2005, “Portland city commissioner Randy Leonard scoffed at a CNN report that said Portland may be one of six cities with "terror sleeper cells" and said the report is part of a public relations campaign being waged by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to force the city into joining an anti-terror task force without conditions.”
In that same article, FBI SAC Jordan stated that the bureau knows of "jihadists" who trained in Afghanistan and other unspecified countries and are now living in Oregon.
"We don't have an imminent threat that we're aware of. But I will say this: We have people here in Oregon that have trained in jihadist camps in bad areas, in the bad neighborhoods of the world," Jordan told the Associated Press in Portland in late January.
The FBI report was apparently not sufficient for the non-believing Randy Leonard, as the article stated: “If sleeper cells are in the community's midst, no one from the Portland FBI has ever told him, Leonard said.”
Although doubtful, one can only hope that the sound of assault rifles being fired in his own backyard by Shabbaz and Abdurahman, who are apparently waging their own public relations campaign of Islamic militancy might be a sufficient wake-up call for the city commissioner and his political sycophants.
Maybe Mr. Leonard condon's things too much as well!
"WE ARE AT WAR ON TWO FRONTS"
Facts,stats,research from realiable sources do not matter.
The level of hate for Bush is insurmountable.
What needs to happen is another 911, in size and numbers of dead, that hit their own backyards, then they will see what evil we face.
In terms of facts, the only one is we are at war, the side we face will not be appeased, compromised with, or bought off.
So until we face Gods will, and the end of time as we know it, we better hold on as long as possible to this country as hard as we need to do it.
The issue is simply some of us are cowards, some of us think that if we just leave these people to themselfs, they will go away, that will not happen.
I'm against in the strongest terms Bush's stance on the border issue, these people are programmed to remove us with "babies" who learn("Those institutions which are fattened by our brothers to provide employment and political pork barrels for the gringo will do so only as acts of liberation and for La Causa. For the very young there will no longer be acts of juvenile delinquency, but revolutionary acts.").
There are the schools that the Muslims teach at a very early age, that we are to be removed if we do not bend and break, the other army we face will do it for now, remove us without firing a shot.
" Self-Defense against the occupying forces of the oppressors at every school, every available man, woman, and child!" "Occupying forces".....that would be us.
Unlike radical Islam, where they must kill us and break our will to maintain what is ours, the others will simply take us down by sheer numbers, then we will not be able to compromise on anything, because it is also their "EL PLAN DE AZTLÁN",to see us removed as well.
For me, I'm damn glad, at least on one front, Bush is there, I'd hate to see what a "sensetive war" is all about.
Post a Comment