Or with us:
(Both Portland pictures)
The Senate is getting ready to sell us out. It seems that a "compromise" bill will be accepted that will ruin this country.
The lawbreakers who came here illegaly will be rewarded, future lawbreakers will come here illegaly and claim that they have been here for years. There is no possible mechanism for verification or enforcement.
Millions of illegal aliens family members will become eligible to be brought to this country.
It's time to tell our junior senator that if he votes for amnesty, if he votes for guest workers, if he votes to allow illegal aliens to stay in this country under any name, we Republicans will not vote for him again.
We will stand by idly and watch his Democrat opponent win in 2008. This is Oregon, he has an "R" next to his name, he needs every vote he can get and and he won't be getting mine if he sells our country out.
Weekends are a perfect time to call because you can leave a message. Monday morning his staffers will come into the office to hundreds of messages saying "Senator Smith, are you will the illegal aliens, or are you with your constituents? If you vote for amnesty we will not vote for you!"
Portland - 503.326.3386
Pendleton - 541.278.1129
Eugene - 541.465.6750
Medford - 541.608.9102
Bend - 541.318.1298
Washington DC - 202.224.3753
Leave him a message!
17 comments:
My message was, that having been a volunteer in his first campaign for the Senate he can count on my working equally as hard or harder to reverse the effort if he supports any kind of Amnesty.
Guest worker perhaps, but no bringing in the entire family back two generations and no automatic path to citizenship for anybody.
Senator Smith,
is simpatico for illegal aliens, don't let him tell you otherwise. I called his Eugene office to vent on the Borper Patrol brass, providing information about the Minutemen, and ask if Sen. Smith would meet with the Oregon Minutemen? His aide flatly said that would never happen. I reminded her that he is running for re-election, and she rudely said no he isn't. She was informed I knew he was already contacting people for campaign contibutions for 08. This guy is a Rino and needs to be replaced. Sen. Wyden and Rep. Defazio's staff were much more courteous!
I'm not a bit surprised that they are voting in favor for the "guest worker" amnesty bill.
It is not about God and country... it's all about money & greed.
Done. I called his DC office and left him a message. I emphasized my belief that we need to secure the border FIRST before we even think about what we are going to do with the illegals here. I then said that if we have to deal with that second issue at the same time, I do not support blanket amnesty for illegals. I also suggested that if, in fact, Bush announces a plan to send the Guard to the border on Monday, that he support that, or any other efforts to fully secure the border first.
I am concerned about Sen. Smiths stance on illegal aliens (calling a spade a spade here) but I am anxiously awaiting Pres. Bush's address Monday. I "have a bad feeling about this" in that he may ignore the wishes of the majority of Americans and push his (disguised) amnesty program forward.
I don't know how the American public will react, though I would bet that "the usual suspects" will be soiling themselves with glee.
I would so love to be wrong!
What is a "hip youth" Mike?
I think that most youth are pretty malleable, looking for a cause and frequently change their views on almost everything when they reach adulthood. (usually corresponding with milestones such as marriage, the birth of a child, realizing that they too have to pay taxes...)
I've always thought that the democrat party and their related causes would be embarrassed to say that the MTV crowd votes with them.
Today's liberal is tomorrow's conservative.
I am a middle of the road type of guy. I don't get too hung up on the politics around here, because to do so would drive one crazy. I make my decision and move on. But I can assure you lefties of one thing, I am the silent majority. When you get me motivated, you have truly done something to stir the pot. Running around with signs of Che, communist flags, and socialist org flyers, that is over the top outrageous when it comes to the border and "brown" people. It's so ridiculous, it just defies any sense of logic at all.
I'll continue to be in the silent majority. You won't see me protesting, but we are out there and we will defy you every step of the way. Yell and scream all you want about your political BS, we are still out here. When it is time to vote, we will stick it in your ass. Enjoy.
Got to love those Che Guevara flags... Are these people complete idiots? Che is a lame ass communist nobody, and they're celebrating him? Goes to show the level of mentality that this group has. I guess rebellion is what they want, and at the Gringo's expense.
I say "Bring it on Wetbacks!" If a fight is what you want than a fight is what you'll get.
Look – If you haven’t gotten it through your head that Mike is more of a nutty statement maker than a reasoned debater by now, you are on something. Anyone who would call people with a Che flag hip is a little out of the realm of reasonable. It sort of makes you wonder, how can any group hold up a flag of someone who believed in mass murder be taken as any serious voice? Why are we listening to them or even considering their “rights”? Why aren’t they thrown on the ash heap with the rest of the vile racist groups that have plagued our world? At this point my patience is sort of running out with treating these people with any kind of civility at all. It’s why Neo Nazis don’t get their opinion treated very seriously. "Nope, sorry, not very interested in mass murder, thanks for your input". I am beginning to think of these people in the same vein. Sure, the Nazis were bad, killed a lot of people, but let’s face it, Che is pretty much a lateral move from Hitler.
My wife was at the Vancouver Mall yesterday with two of our daughters and our twin granddaughters. She was in the food court reading a magazine waiting for the others to wind down their shopping when two Mexican women(I won't refer to them as ladies) got on either side of her and started ranting about their doing work wwe won't do, that we can't get along without them, etc., yada yada. They finally left her alone when she threatened to call the mall security.
My wife is 73 with aheart problem. She does not need nor does she deserve this kind of hassling. She doesn't know if they are illegal or no, but I would bet they are. These creeps need to be rounded up and taken back to their country. Along with all their compatriots. And it needs to be done NOW!! In spite of razonador and roger doger and all the other ultra-liberal wack-jobs out there.
And once again Mike demonstrates why he isn’t exactly on the A list when it comes to forming a cogent argument. If dissent is hip then it then follows that Nazis are hip. It would also pretty much follow that abortion clinic bombers are hip as well as racial supremacists of all stripes. The interesting thing would be to see how hip Mike would be when this group of hip racial supremacists was gutting his hipster self open. In that respect it is an interesting point
Dissent for some laudable goal? Possibly hip. Dissent for a racialist Aztlan society, with Che as some role model? Definitely not hip.
As for Che being trendy? Good luck on that one. Trendy is one thing Che most certainly is not. Che’s main contribution was he was photogenic. That’s why its been the same picture on the same T shirt and flags for 30 years. If Mike were a little older, or a little smarter, he would know that. Che has a popular picture, very true. But something that has been used in the same way for decades could hardly be called trendy. Oh well better luck next time Mikey
Mike – dude, you’re loosing it. Put down the pipe man. You can do it, just walk away. If you cant do that, then please try and refrain from two things:
One - Don’t let my use of proper grammar and word usage threaten you. It’s simply the way I speak. Deal with it. If you don’t have the education or wits to use words properly and with some semblance of reasonable grammar, that’s not my problem.
Two – Don’t use words you don’t understand. The word you were looking for was “paragraph” not “stanza”. Stanza generally refers to a section within a poem or song. Incorrect word usage or poor grammar isn’t really a big deal generally. But when you criticize someone for grammar, it’s best to cite examples and not use completely incorrect words in an attempt to appear more educated than you are. In this case it has caused your argument to fall completely flat. It confirms little but that people who speak well threaten you. I would suggest not trying so hard the next time. Use simple words and don’t try to over reach. Better luck next time!
Che Guevara was a murderer. He presided over the executions of thousands of innocent people in Cuba and South America. If these people have a “Che” flag, do the also have a “Hitler” or “Stalin” flag?
Che is one man. The comparison doesn't work.
Wow, that takes me back. I remember when I was a teen and that "so what, America is responsible for lots of deaths too" moral equivalency tack seemed thoughtful. Anyone else remember being into that same tired crap that, at the time, we thought was so novel?
Oh and Mike? Nice try about not knowing what stanza meant. You brighten my day like no ones business kid, thanks.
I really enjoyed looking at your site, I found it very helpful indeed, keep up the good work.
»
Great site lots of usefull infomation here.
»
Post a Comment