Burning with a deep rage at the audacity of criminals marching in the streets, demanding "rights" while our government sits idly by is not going to accomplish anything.
(Neither is marching in the streets waving Mexican flags and talking about "brown pride" (KPTV 12) but that's ok, it's turning people off)
So what are some steps to take?
*Write/Call/Fax your senator or any senator!
*Get involved with Oregonians for Immigration Reform
*REMINDER: Come to Salem School Board MTG. Tues. 11th @ 6 pm.
*Come to Woodburn on April 22 for a Matricula Consular protest. (more details to follow)
*May 1st is "don't buy anything day" if you are a communist-criminal alien loving moron. Since you are a capitalist who believes that illegal aliens should be deported immediately go buy something on that day.
*We need some people to attend a Town Hall Meeting with Senator Smith in Prineville. Buy yourself a small digital recorder and ask him why he would vote for amnesty.
*Stay posted here.
14 comments:
"The stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you and thou shalt love him as thyself" -- LEVITICUS
I don't hate illegal aliens as people. I expect them to follow the law and respect the government and authority like the Bible says to.
Where is the School Board Meeting?
Nazis were the law and it was illegal for German citizens to harbor Jews. Were those who turned Jews in acting in accordance with the Bible?
"has made the empirical case that the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants are not contributing positively economically (and from my humble perspective, culturally)"
Please make the "empirical case" and list specific "cultural" contributions. Inquiring minds really want to know. No sarcasm intended. I really would like to know your thoughts.
Hey Denise -- I'm furious that I had to pay for Daniel's appeals that he was unjustly arrested, all the way to the Oregon Supreme Court, but you don't see me asking that he be punished for it. But then again, Daniel, did you serve any time? If not, maybe you should. A little of Bubba's tenderness would do you well. Pay your debt!
Anonymous,
Why do you keep picking on Daniel? Are you so insecure in your beliefs that you have to constantly downgrade someone who has turned his life around? I love most of the comments here, but yours should be banned as not even having anything to do with the subject of the current blog.
To Liberty44,
Maybe if he explains what gives him the right to call people criminals, without looking at himself as one (especially a violent felon), then we will keep on mentioning that.
Why does he dodge the question? Before he goes and points finger, he should look in the mirror (pinhead and moustache) and see himself for who he really is.
boo hoo, please don't ban me, my life revolves around the whole issue of making Daniel look bad.
/end sarcasm
//Funny seeing how the rednecks in here have so many empty headed idiotic arguments. All the lefties who read this blog, do so out as a form of comedy relief. This is what happens when you give rednecks a broadband internet connection, total comedy!
All I'm saying is that if I have to be bent over in order, as a taxpayer, to subsidize his ridiculous criminal appeals, he should, by his own vindictive logic, have to be bent over by Bubba as resitution. What's wrong with that? Completely on topic...
Try reporting illegals:
http://www.emergencyemail.org/newsemergency/templates/templatestandard1.asp?articleid=13&zoneid=1
Anonymous, I believe I covered my past in this post.
I'm not a felon.
I definitely believe that the practice of having automatic appeals should be stopped. As I have previously indicated I was not aware of the appeals until I received a letter at which point I stopped all further action.
You can continue to beat this dead horse but no one seems to care but you.
Thiscountry does not need any more immigration laws any more than we need more gun control laws. What this country needs is to enforce the laws already on the books. There is one law on the books now that says essentially that people who enter this country are doing so illegally and are considered to be felons. This is part of the INS laws controlling immigration. This is aconcept that is absolutely and completely foreign (pun not intended) to people like razonador, roger doger, anonymous the ultra-liberal pontificator, and others of their negative mindset.
All Congress is doing in bringing out their inane amnesty bills is to waste time, the taxpayer's money, and to try to justify their existence for being in D.C. in the first place.
El Razonador, in your post above, you said many nice things about Latinos/Hispanics/Mexicans.
I just wish you could say that they're honest.
But they're not. They break the law. They break the law every day. They break the law for money. They teach their children it's good to break the law (which shows them to be bad parents).
Not the kind of people I'd want living next door.
Illegals' Amnesty Could Cost $60 Billion a Year, Group Says
By Randy Hall
CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor
April 11, 2006
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200604/NAT20060411c.html
(CNSNews.com) - If an illegal immigrant amnesty or guest worker program similar to the ones being contemplated by the U.S. Senate and supported by President Bush were enacted, the cost to state and local governments would be staggering, an immigration reform group charged Tuesday.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates that state and local costs associated with illegal immigration for public education, health care and incarceration, now about $36 billion a year, would balloon to $61.5 billion by 2010 -- a 70 percent increase -- and increase to $106.3 billion by 2020.
As a result of an amnesty and a vastly expanded guest worker program, millions of current illegal aliens would gain legal access to government programs and services, a FAIR analysis states.
Moreover, newly legalized aliens would be allowed to bring their dependents to this country, adding to the burdens on schools and public health care. Similarly, state and local governments would have to provide for the education and health care of the dependents of the 400,000 new guest workers called for in the Senate proposal.
"From every possible angle, an illegal alien amnesty and guest worker program would be a fiscal and administrative nightmare," said Dan Stein, president of FAIR. "Never mind the fact that an illegal alien amnesty is a moral betrayal of the American public and immigrants who played by the rules.
"It would be an unfunded federal mandate that will bankrupt states, counties and cities all across the United States," Stein added.
Contrary to claims by proponents of amnesty, the tax contributions of newly legalized illegal aliens would not offset the additional costs, he stated. The estimated 12 million illegal aliens in the U.S. are overwhelmingly poorly educated and low skilled.
Even with legalization, their earning potential would be very limited, Stein noted. With the ability to legitimately claim dependents on their returns, their tax contributions would be negligible at best, and with programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit, many will actually get more back than they pay in.
None of the federal or local costs associated with an illegal alien amnesty or a massive guest worker program has even been considered as part of the Senate's deliberations, he said.
When asked point blank about the ramifications of their proposed legislation, Senate amnesty and guest worker supporters admitted that they have not been worked out. "The devil is in the details," said the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, Patrick Leahy of Vermont.
"'The devil is in the details' is an utterly reckless and irresponsible way to conduct public policy," responded Stein. "The fiscal, social, environmental and demographic consequences of what the Senate is proposing would be staggering.
"In an effort to respond to special interest pressure, the Senate and the Bush administration seem prepared to rush forward without any rational assessment of what it would mean for the future of the nation," he noted.
"We have seen where the 'devil is in the details' approach has gotten us in Iraq. The president and others pushing amnesty and guest workers have an obligation to think this one all the way through before acting," Stein concluded.
A breakdown of the calculation of amnesty costs and a state by state impact analysis can be found at FAIR's website.
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=research_localcosts
Post a Comment