Olbermann Attacks Coulter, Defends ‘Godless’ Liberals (VIDEO)
Back to my allusion to the nightmare of having to defend Ann Coulter at a sanity hearing. That was inappropriate, because it was insufficient. Imagine, in fact, defending her on judgment day, trying to find her soul.
Anyone who gets liberals panties in a wad like this must be doing something right. Buy her new book.
18 comments:
everyone should support Ann coulter and purchase her new book.besides it is a good read.
I'll be buying my copy soon. Anything that drives the moonbats this crazy must be really good!! New motto for the dems...."the truth shall make us crazy."
I prefer the "Hijacking of Jesus" by Dan Wakefield. It is a great book about the sickness of self proclaimed conservative Christians--many who darken this blog. Their perversion of the Jesus' teachings and the bible for their own political, monitary and social gains is exposed for all who read it. An al-Coulter's book, on the other hand, in no way compares to the genius and wit of Wakefield.
Douglas -
Regarding the "sickness of self proclaimed conservative Christians... (who's) perversion of the Jesus' teachings and the bible (is) for their own political, monitary and social gains..." which you claim as espoused by Dan Wakefield, and (apparently) embraced by you:
Would you be kind enough to enlighten us with some examples?
Thank you.
I find Ann Coulter just about as shrill and unpleasant as many of the far-left loudmouths. No sale. Put her in a cage with Rosie O'Donnell for a brutal deathmatch- now I'd pay top dollar to see that.
"Of course liberalism is a religion. It has its own cosmology, its own miracles, its own beliefs in the supernatural, its own churches, its own high priests, its own saints, its own total worldview, and its own explanation of the existence of the universe. In other words, liberalism contains all the attributes of what is generally known as ‘religion.’"
I might read it. Just to see on what grounds any one of those things could possibly be validated.
The only time I ever watched Olbermann is when I was channel surfing. I'd stop for a minute to see what was going on. It seemed like half the time I'd catch him in the middle of some anti-Bill O'Reilly rant. Now I just click on by. I think he's got some personal problems.
I see Keith Olberman as being a joke who frequently comes across an idiot on MSNBC - he should get back on the meds he stopped taking or start breaking his prozac in half. With that said, I find it difficult to defend Ann Coulter with the one chapter she mentions the 4 NJ widows as enjoying the death of their husbands - that sounds as vile as something coming from the left. However, I will say that I might buy the book later and rip out that chapter where the reference is made. Her reference to Liberalism as their religion is spot on !
She does her homework and is formidable in debate. She also sticks to the facts, unlike the "hate purveyors" from the left, like Michael Moore, Al Franken, and Hillary Clinton), who resort to half-truths and conspiracy theories to try and sell their books.
It is really amusing to watch the left wing in action , the only weapons they have and that they know how to use are bad language,insinuations,slanted and distorted stories,(even to the point of out right lies)and denial of truth. They are also true bigots.two perfect examples to all of this are Douglas and Dodger.
roger, you're an idiot.
Roger,
Brilliant comeback!
Want to buy a clue?
I have no more time to waste on you.
[May you live in interesting times!]
"bad language,insinuations,slanted and distorted stories,(even to the point of out right lies)and denial of truth. They are also true bigots."
You honestly don't think the "right wing," however we define it, relies on exactly the same methods?
Ann Coulter did not say that the Jersey girls enjoyed the death of their husbands. AC said she had never seen anyone enjoy the death of their husbands more.
The difference is more than subtle.
It is an opinion that could be defended, though still harsh.
The first statement is not defenseable.
A lady who wrote to the editors of the Columbian this morning made a very good point about Coulte's book. In her letter she said that Ward Churchill called the people who died in the 9-11 attacks as "Little Eichmans" who deserved exactly what they got. (Did the little children killed then "deserve what they got"?) The mainstream media said little or nothing about that, tacitly approving of what he said. But Ann Coulter has called those four women who were widowed and bitching about "only" $1.6 million in compensation as not being anywhere enough for their losses, denouncing the Bush administration for everything from the Iraq war to the bird flu and back again as "harpies", and subsequently gets excoriated day after day ad infinitum ad nauseum in the press, on TV, on the radio. Doesn't this take on the tone of a huge double standard here?
And the ironic thing about all this bad press and bad mouthing of Ms. Coulter is that it has had the effect of selling more of her books than even she could have imagined.
I think that is a great turnabout against her naysayers.
A lady who wrote to the editors of the Columbian this morning made a very good point about Coulte's book. In her letter she said that Ward Churchill called the people who died in the 9-11 attacks as "Little Eichmans" who deserved exactly what they got. (Did the little children killed then "deserve what they got"?) The mainstream media said little or nothing about that, tacitly approving of what he said. But Ann Coulter has called those four women who were widowed and bitching about "only" $1.6 million in compensation as not being anywhere enough for their losses, denouncing the Bush administration for everything from the Iraq war to the bird flu and back again as "harpies", and subsequently gets excoriated day after day ad infinitum ad nauseum in the press, on TV, on the radio. Doesn't this take on the tone of a huge double standard here?
And the ironic thing about all this bad press and bad mouthing of Ms. Coulter is that it has had the effect of selling more of her books than even she could have imagined.
I think that is a great turnabout against her naysayers.
I hate to change the subject but, This is an important message, please read and pass it along. I have a message to tell you about Revelation. The message is from God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost sent in the Spring of 2006. It is about the meaning of First is Last and Last is First as written in Revelation. The message is this: In the morning I go to Heaven. In the afternoon I live my life. In the evening I die, death. What does this mean? In other words this means Birth is Last and Last is Birth. To understand this don't think from point A to point B. Think of this as a continous circle of life. Birth, Life, Death, Birth. God also said that Judgment will be before Birth in Heaven. AS birth on Earth is painful so will birth in Heaven. It is possible that this message was delivered by one of God's Angels. Yes, God has made contact and he sent a messanger. Spread this message along, just like a chain letter. Melanie Stephan
God had more to say in 2007. His message is this:
"We each die in succession, then we are born on the same day."
This is one small piece of Proof:
Like I said earlier, the Holy Spirit talked to me, besides his message about First is Last and Last is First, he had something to say about “Who Killed JFK”. Christ tells me that the man who shot JFK is a policeman. He also tells me the name of the shooter, but it is in a jumbled word. The word is “Fritters”. I see the name F. Ritter right off so I think that is the name of the killer. Now God has lots of other messages for me to figure out, so I put “Who Killed JFK” on the back burner for over a year. A year or more later , just recently, I have more time to look for F. Ritter. I can’t find a policeman with that name who lived in Dallas, Texas in 1963. So I start searching for information about who killed JFK and there is a picture of a policeman by the name of JD Tippit. Now Tippit kind of looks like Ritter. Now I un-jumble the letters of Ritter to TIRRET. Now TIRRET looks more like TIPPIT. Now I make the R’s stand at attention, I get TIPPET. One problem is that the I and the E are not the same. So I do some research on the family name TIPPIT. Turns out that in the late 1800’s JD Tippit’s grandfather changed their name from Tippett to Tippit. So the next step I change the E to I. So Tippet is now Tippit.
Now I have FS Tippit and JD Tippit. The first two initials are not the same. Next I go to Wikipedia there I find that JD does not stand for anything. That means his name is just J D. So the initials F S, do not stand for anything. I just have two initials that do not stand for anything. Are you following me?
Next what does FRITTERS mean. If your following my thinking here, God is going to tell you what happened to JD Tippit after he was shot. Fritters are a dough that is deep fried. Bread also means body, like in the last super Christ takes the bread and says this is my body. Look in the dictionary, PIT means HELL. TIP means money paid, gratuity. There are other meanings to Tip and Pit, you can look them up yourself.
JD Tippits body (dough) is placed in the deep fryer (lake of fire). Now I think this clue (Fritters) was INGENIUS. After all God came up with it. I think he does have a sense of humor too. Kids now have a new game to play. They can play God. Pilsbury dough boy fry’s in the lake of fire. You get HELL! fry baby fry!
If you think this is just crazy. Remember I am just the messenger. Jesus is the one that had to talk about JFK. So he had a reason for doing that. He told me who Killed JFK so that you would believe his messages are from God. Only God knows who killed JFK. I had forgotten about the case years ago. This is a cold case now, it been 45 year since the shooting.
I also read the part about giving false prophesy. God says false prophets go to Hell or something like that. I only repeat what God told me. Now what I wrote above is from God. He told me who killed JFK in 2006. The above is not a lie or a joke and I am going to HEAVEN without fear.
Before I forget. Gods messeges usually have more than one meaning. F S could also stand for “Fence Shooter”.
Who are the co-conspirators? Turns out that there are two policemen named Tippit, and one Tippett working in the Dallas police Department that same year(1963). Back to the clue word Fritters. That is plural, you know about plural. We have two fritters. The co-conspirators name is Gayle M. Tippit.
Now the Dallas Police Department obviously covered up and framed Oswald. He was the Patsy. They did it cause it is very possible that one of the other police officers rushing to the scene saw Tippet fleeing the scene carrying a rifle. They covered it up because of the embarrassment of one of their own was the man that killed JFK? And the Warren commission must have also figured that out so they stuck with the Dallas Dept. story saying that it was Oswald. It could have been a National embarrassment. Now if you look at the evidence like I did. It is easy to see that the DAllas Police Dept tampered with the evidence over and over again. And they did a very bad job of it too.
Now this is my opinion, not Gods. I think God is behind the creation of the Internet. I could never have been able to figure out a lot of his messages without the use of the Internet. People on the Net have been a big help to me. God talks to other people too, they just don’t know it. God let me know it was him.
It is impossible for anyone to do what I do, with Gods help. How is that?
Now I just made solving the case of “Who shot JFK?”, look easy. I also gave you proof here. Did you see it? You ask where’s the proof. The proof is that it is impossible for anyone to repeat what I just did above. I mean try it. And I do that over and over again in all of God’s messages.
See if you can make up a word that is a fried food (like fritters). Unjumble the letters to reveal the name of the killer (Tippit). Then divide the word Tippit into words that describe what happened. Tip- means that JD Tippit was paid for the job and the presidency was over turned. Pit - means that he went to Hell for what he did. Pit means the worst Hell.
See if you can prove me wrong. Show me how easy it is to make up a name like “Fritters” that solves the crime. This clue is ingenious. God came up with the name “FRITTERS”. God is a genius, not me. I am only the messenger.
Then the two remaining letters F. S. stands for Fence Shooter. It ingenius!
Then on top of that it just so happens that there are two Tippit’s working in the Dallas Police Department in 1963. Fritters (plural) means we have more than one Fritter going in the deep fryer . The other shooter is Gayle M. Tippit. He goes to Hell too. Now I did some research on Gayle M Tippit. There is very little information on him unlike JD Tippit. In my search I found two Gayle Tippit’s still in Dallas. One died in 1967 and the other is married and still lives in Texas. So the other conspirator could still be alive and has managed to avoid detection.
This is where it gets intesting. Does Gayle M. Tippit come forward and ask God to forgive him? I think he also has to ask the American people to forgive him for his part in the murder of the president or he gets the worst Hell just like JD did. God told me that waiting until the 11th hour is too late. God is forgiving, but you can’t wait until your on your death bed to ask to be forgiven.
Now if Gayle M. Tippit wants to save himself from the deep fryer. (This could be a long fry, not a quick dip.) He has to come forward and ask to be forgiven. He still gets death or Hell but it won’t be the worst Hell. Just like the worst death is being crucified.
Gods messenger, Melanie Stephan
Post a Comment