The jihadists will zoom in on the (pretend) chicks, due to their sexy lip hardware. They claim to want to "teach" us about gender identity, just like Michael (macho-man) Jackson. Then, they express their desire to outrage. That, folks, is exhibitionism, narcissism, and a clear indication that the gay agenda is more important to them than coexistence. Sorry, not buying it. Gays don't get to declare their perverted behavior to be normal. They know that they must continue to force their ideology on the public through the lefty legislature, or through the illegal acts perpetrated by the likes of the "girls of hawthorne."
...I don't know what that means. I truly fail to make the connection between the girl I watched in that video and issues of "coexistence" and "ideology." Nor do I see any "illegal acts." Can someone enlighten me here?
Kaelri, a short time back, the women on the Multnomah County Commission attempted, with the help of a lesbian lawyer, to usurp and change, by fiat, the Oregon Constitution, in order to justify so-called "gay marriage." They were thwarted in this illegal use of power by the Oregon Supreme Court. They were humiliated and had to acknowledge that they had misled and duped a large number of otherwise sincere (but silly) homosexuals into thinking that such a "marriage" could exist. Every one of those faux "marriages" was disallowed. The County Chairwoman was removed from office for that and other lefty atrocities committed during her term. You don't understand the other terms you mentioned because, well, you don't understand a lot of things that you should, do you?
Try Webster's, anon 5:48. Being another apologist for the perverted gay agenda is so lame of you......sheesh. BTW, 'splain it to the jihadists, as they must be much better at that "normal" thing than me, and, of course, much more tolerant....lol.
I looked up normal, and again, you are far from what fits the definition, Bear. The only "perverted" agenda is your perverted view of what the United States should stand for. Infringing upon other's rights and scrutinizing someone over something they cannot control (homosexuality is NOT A CHOICE, see any psychological study on the issue).
Nice try with the straw man tactic, and also great job on employing "a common lefty tactic" of changing the subject to terrorism. From now on, stay on topic please.
Anon 11:20 ... careful, I wouldn't challenge these morons to look at "any" psychological study of the issue. Because if there are 10,000 legitimate, peer-reviewed studies by serious, qualified scientists, they'll find the TWO that were coughed up by some "expert" on the subject (probably some poor tortured soul -- a "former" gay man packing a King James Bible who took a psychology class at a community college no one ever heard of) who can "prove" with "science" that sexual orientation is a choice -- no doubt the product of "research" paid for by some right-wing evangelical group.
9 comments:
Better send a link of that story to the nearest Islamic Center so they can include those details in their latest Need to Dispatch, dispatch.
The jihadists will zoom in on the (pretend) chicks, due to their sexy lip hardware. They claim to want to "teach" us about gender identity, just like Michael (macho-man) Jackson. Then, they express their desire to outrage. That, folks, is exhibitionism, narcissism, and a clear indication that the gay agenda is more important to them than coexistence. Sorry, not buying it. Gays don't get to declare their perverted behavior to be normal. They know that they must continue to force their ideology on the public through the lefty legislature, or through the illegal acts perpetrated by the likes of the "girls of hawthorne."
...I don't know what that means. I truly fail to make the connection between the girl I watched in that video and issues of "coexistence" and "ideology." Nor do I see any "illegal acts." Can someone enlighten me here?
Kaelri, a short time back, the women on the Multnomah County Commission attempted, with the help of a lesbian lawyer, to usurp and change, by fiat, the Oregon Constitution, in order to justify so-called "gay marriage." They were thwarted in this illegal use of power by the Oregon Supreme Court. They were humiliated and had to acknowledge that they had misled and duped a large number of otherwise sincere (but silly) homosexuals into thinking that such a "marriage" could exist. Every one of those faux "marriages" was disallowed. The County Chairwoman was removed from office for that and other lefty atrocities committed during her term.
You don't understand the other terms you mentioned because, well, you don't understand a lot of things that you should, do you?
Bear, you are far from the arbiter of what can be considered "normal."
Try Webster's, anon 5:48. Being another apologist for the perverted gay agenda is so lame of you......sheesh. BTW, 'splain it to the jihadists, as they must be much better at that "normal" thing than me, and, of course, much more tolerant....lol.
I looked up normal, and again, you are far from what fits the definition, Bear. The only "perverted" agenda is your perverted view of what the United States should stand for. Infringing upon other's rights and scrutinizing someone over something they cannot control (homosexuality is NOT A CHOICE, see any psychological study on the issue).
Nice try with the straw man tactic, and also great job on employing "a common lefty tactic" of changing the subject to terrorism. From now on, stay on topic please.
Anon 11:20 ... careful, I wouldn't challenge these morons to look at "any" psychological study of the issue. Because if there are 10,000 legitimate, peer-reviewed studies by serious, qualified scientists, they'll find the TWO that were coughed up by some "expert" on the subject (probably some poor tortured soul -- a "former" gay man packing a King James Bible who took a psychology class at a community college no one ever heard of) who can "prove" with "science" that sexual orientation is a choice -- no doubt the product of "research" paid for by some right-wing evangelical group.
Bear -
Don't you find it ironic that your views on homosexuality are quite in line with the beliefs of the Jihadists?
Post a Comment