Saturday, February 24, 2007

Party bashing

Democrats: The party of feminine men and masculine women... but claim they support nature.

Republicans: This will say it all. (in my words: you dirty, slimy, illegal alien loving, traitors to America. No money to the RNC ever!)

12 comments:

Bobkatt said...

While I don't like either party and wish they would all be eliminated, this is hardly an issue I would get behind. This "game" seems very childish and does give ammunition to the other side. A much more helpful display would be one such as was held in Washington a couple of months ago with a small section of fence and volunteers discussing the issue and handing out brochures. To me this way of getting attention ranks up there with the Mexicans offering virtual reality tours to rich Mexicans that want to experience border jumping without actually going there.

Bobkatt said...

P.S. I just saw Gordo Smith and Ron Wyden on TV this afternoon at one of our local townhall meetings. I have to admit Wyden was vocally more hardline illegal alien than Smith. Twice Smith implied that there is no way an employer can legally verify if a potential employee is here legally or not. I guess he never heard of the 1-800 number to verify social security numbers. Smith must go.

Anonymous said...

>>> Democrats: The party of feminine men and masculine women... but claim they support nature.<<<<

I am in awe of the mighty intellect behind these profound words. What insight! Such extraordinary political clarity!

Anonymous said...

I WANT VANCE DAY'S HEAD ON A PLATTER IF THE KENNEDY BILL IN DC PASS'S, HE HASN'T GOT THE PARTY HERE UP IN ARMS AT ALL. THE HELL WITH THE PARTY LINE THERE..IT'S HERE THAT COUNTS.

WHY HASN'T HE CALLED FOR EMAILS AND CALLS FROM HERE TO KNOCK "FAT TEDDY" OFF HIS CHAIR?

Scottiebill said...

I am with Amy on this one. I am also considering re-registering as an Independent.

One person in today's Fish Wrap said (paraphrasing here), "Why would anyone vote for a Democrat when they are the ones supporting the terrorists?" The only reason one would vote for a Democrat could be that they agree with the anti-American, pro-terrorist stance the so-called leaders and arm-chair generals (like John "I never saw a bribe I didn't like" Murtha) are espousing every day in Washington D.C. And before Kaelri gets his/her back up about that, Murtha was caught on tape a few years ago negotiating a bribe during the Abscam business.

That writer was right as far as she went. She should have included all those RINO's in that statement, starting with Victoria Taft's Gang of 7.

Kaelri said...

Hate America? Love the people trying to kill us to make a political point? Vote Democrat!

We staunchly support al Qaeda so much that we're willing to defend Americans' constitutional liberties! Even if it means forcing the CIA to return to using interrogation techniques proven to yield better information!

We despise American soldiers so much that we intend to remove them from the crossfire of a civil war in which their presence would only continue to catalyze anti-Western sentiment!

At the very least, those principled, peace-loving Republicans cannot stop us from hindering our soldiers' mission in Iraq by providing body armor and post-war medical treatment!

We pledge to make it easier for Islamic extremists to murder thousands of a Americans, by implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

And we can think of no greater gesture to our beloved idol, Osama bin Laden, than killing him.

Choose death. Vote blue.

I'm Joe Republican and I approve this message.

BEAR said...

Hey, Amy, dittos! (BTW, I heard somewhere that proofreading helps....lol).
And as for YOU, kidiot, aka kaelri, explain why al qaida has been rooting for democrat victories since '92. How about shared goals? They hate freedom. They hate President Bush. They hate Israel. They seek the destruction of America. They indoctrinate the children in their "schools" with anti-American and anti-Christian sloganism. They accuse anyone disagreeing with their politics of racism and bigotry. They hate capitalism. They hate the Patriot Act. They rely upon lies and propaganda and the traitors in the msm to spread their message. Sound familiar? DUH, all they have to do is follow the democrat platform, which they frequently quote. You and the other anti-American lefties can't claim to be against the islamo-facsists when you support their methods and sympathize with their psychopathic philosophy. Until you, the democrat party, and the still silent imams stand up in physical opposition to the terrorists, your credibility will match your i.q., i.e.; no higher than ted kennedy's bra size. You fool no one with your feeble sophistry........sheesh.
Amy....maybe one less cup of coffee tomorrow?

Bryan said...

Bear,

If that is your best rebuttal, than I feel even more comfortable about my political views than before.
Next time you respond, how about you avoid throwing canards left and right and provide tangible examples.

"You and the other anti-American lefties can't claim to be against the islamo-facsists when you support their methods and sympathize with their psychopathic philosophy"

You, sir, are the anti-American. When you support ideals that contradict the inalienable rights as presented in the constitution (Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, illegal wire tapings, the abolition of the writ of Habeas corpus, ect) then you, on a purely technical basis, are the one contributing to the overall detriment of this great country.

Do I honestly believe you are anti-American? Of course not. I would venture to say, however, that the claim you make is more ridiculous than mine.

"Until you, the democrat party, and the still silent imams stand up in physical opposition to the terrorists, your credibility will match your i.q., i.e.; no higher than ted kennedy's bra size."

Bear, I can't tell you how many studies have concluded that escalated foreign presence in the middle east contributes positively to extremist recruiting efforts, but you can start by reading Robert Pape's work. Pape recently released a report based on the biographies of suicide bombers that suggested that they were ordinary citizens who were both disenfranchised by the United States and newcomers to Islam, aka had little doctrinal background, were the ones most likely to become suicide bombers. By subscribing to an academic journal, it wouldn't be difficult for you to find other articles suggesting the same.

"You fool no one with your feeble sophistry"

I'll just assume that's your way of saying "I cant prove you wrong so f**k you."

Kaelri said...

I never had the heart to put it to him like that.

Anonymous said...

Did the idiots in DC save any life's here with their non-binding BS ? No, they may have just killed some of us!

Do you PROGRESSIVES/ LEFTIST, think you can "talk" your way out of another 9II?

Is there a place for Radical Islam here, living in peace?


Why did we run out of body armor when we went to Iraq? If you look who "killed" at least 2 divisions of battle ready troops, do you want that person as president of the USA?

Will the party in power have the guts to "kill" illegal immigration?

If you think for a minute......we are safer with a "LIB/PROGRESSIVE/LEFTIST" in 2008, you maybe "CRIMINALLY INSANE!"

GOT ANSWERS? LET'S HEAR THEM!

Anonymous said...

BASHING THE GOP....

I WANT VANCE DAY'S HEAD ON A PLATTER IF THE KENNEDY BILL IN DC PASS'S, HE HASN'T GOT THE PARTY HERE UP IN ARMS AT ALL. THE HELL WITH THE PARTY LINE THERE..IT'S HERE THAT COUNTS.

WHY HASN'T HE CALLED FOR EMAILS AND CALLS FROM HERE TO KNOCK "FAT TEDDY" OFF HIS CHAIR?

BEAR said...

Hey, bs, nice try, but, as usual, you change the subject rather than answer any question. Once more, please.....Why are the democrat talking points, debate positions, and stated goals identical to those of the islamo-fascists? Why are you and the imams silent re condemning islamo-fascism? Why can't you simply answer a question? If you don't support the jihadists and the religion of death, please stop defending them and their methods. And please stop changing the subject. After all, that's a technique of sophistry.