Thursday, December 11, 2008

Open to suggestions

Are you kidding me? You need to steal the fruits of our labor instead of eliminating one of the following state agencies?

Keep in mind that most of those agencies have multiple divisions within the agency. Then the divisions have offices. Then the offices have to have units.

And I'm sure that each unit needs a cultural competency coordinator.

19 comments:

NML said...

I think they should eliminate your servant/wife's state job Miglavs. I mean, according to Miglavian
"teachings" regarding State of Oregon hiring practices, it's highly likely that her ethnicity played a pretty big part in her hiring. Isn't that sacrilegious in Miglavia? Besides, there's WAY too many people managing the State's retirement program anyway. How many people are employed in your wife's agency/division/office/unit? I mean, really, how many employees does it take to keep track of a bunch of pensions, especially when things are completely automated now? Besides, Miglavs, you would feel so much better about yourself if you were able to say you don't profit in any way from the fruits of OUR labor. You certainly can't say that now. Think about it folks! The fruits of OUR labor get deposited in Miglavs bank account every two weeks. Yet he mewls incessantly about state workers. WTF Miglavs! I bet he's going to tell us that his servant/wife's job is too important to her agency/division/office/unit to be eliminated. I bet her position is "indispensable," right Miglavs? LMAO.

Your servant/ wife needs to unlatch her plump Mexican senorita lips off the Oregon Sow's teat, Miglavs. You wouldn't want to be a hypocrite, right Miglavs? No, you wouldn't want that at all. Right?

Anonymous said...

10:08, fuck you, mother fucker. You are exactly the piece of shit troll I was referring to the other day. Eat a dick and die, fag.

Anonymous said...

Scottiebill:

Here we have Anon 11:04 aka Exhibit A. Of course, I am sure you and Bobkatt will give him one of your convoluted
"Bobkatt/Scottiebill" Miglavian hall pass since he's obviously a conservative from "your side."

This moron posts here several times a day... always the same pathetic pubescent "eat a dick and die" routine. Yet, curiously, you always let him slide. In fact, I haven't seen either you or your buddy BobKatt criticize him and his "name calling" a single time.

Hmmmmmmmm......

Anonymous said...

Strike "moron," insert "pathetic loser."

Anonymous said...

Who started this shit? It wasn't me, but I'll be happy to finish it. Like I've said before, ass-munchers, I only say this shit in response to your personal attacks. Your shit pisses me off, and I have no problem telling you about it. It's not my problem that you want to be a fag about the whole thing and cry like the bitch that you are. Answer me this, why the fuck did you not go after NML? It's either because you are NML, you fucking pussy, or you approve of it's post. So, when you shut the fuck up, I shut the fuck up. You see, it's like that. Mother fucker.

Anonymous said...

Anon 1:19 -- Exactly who attacked you "personally?" Are you always this hyper-sensitive? Do you wear tights and a cape?

Bobkatt said...

anon 11:18-I have criticized anon 11:04 before but what good does it do? I don't know how to find those instances. Scottie has done the same and incurred the wrath of mister pottie mouth.
For all I know it could be you making those posts. But to criticize him does but reinforce his or her opinion that anyone gives a shit what he thinks.
I think you should really think about what you bring to this blog. You constantly citicize Daniel and insult his wife and he doesn't ban you. You seem to think you have discovered a humorous term "Maglavian" and proceed to lump everyone into that catagory that disagrees with you. You seem to have never offered any idea or thing of value
to this discussion. Just anti-Daniel 24/7.
You are often one of the first to post on any given subject. I wonder why you even come to this blog? I don't troll the Daily Kos or any Liberal blog. Just why do you have so much hatred for Daniel?
Mr. Pottie mouth doesn't speak for any one but himself and doesn't contribute anything of value, but neither do you.

El Phantasmo said...

Bobkatt -- Thankyou. I, for one, am glad to know that you haven't let Little Master Gosuckadick slide. I say "for one" because I am certainly NOT the only Anon, usually NOT the first one to post, and most certainly NOT the only Anon to use the term "Miglavian." You don't really think Anon is just one person, do you?

Bobkatt, can you get any more holier-than-thou? What do YOU bring to this blog? Your posts here are almost entirely whining about Democrats. Your criticism of liberals is 24/7. Archives tell the story Bobkatt. There's rarely a post from you that cites pertinent or relevant information, an idea or concept that might shed light on, or expand Daniel's "musings." You call names, chastise "anonymouses" and act as the proverbial "yes man."

Daniel deserves to be called out on his HYPOCRISIES, period. So what if you don't like it. And as far as "hatred" goes, I think that's a little strong and more of your typical holier-than-thou crapola, because when it comes to "hating," BobKatt, you're no angel.

That's a big part of the whole "conservative" disconnect. Conservatives don't seem to get it -- that when you dish it out, the chances are pretty good that somewhere down the line you're going to have to take it.

This whole Palin thing is a good example. You whine and mewl about "attacks" (an overly dramatic word) on poor Sarah Palin. As if! As if Barack Obama and his wife were treated nicely and fairly by your side for the length of his campaign. Get real, Bobkatt. There's absolutely no reflection going on with conservatives. There's no moment when they ponder "wait a minute, maybe we don't have a face to talk after some of the shit we spewed about Obama."

Since you seem so certain of the quality of your contributions to this blog, perhaps you can site some of them, because the posts I've perused this morning don't reflect your opinion of yourself Bobkatt.

Now, just to make you happy, I will no longer post as Anon. Then you'll really be able to tell "who posts first" and who "constantly" (yeah, right) insults Daniel's servant/wife. Daniel's a big boy, he can take it. At least he understands the concept that a blog full of "yes men" makes for a very boring blog indeed.

Oh, and by the way, I have never visited the Daily KOS and never will.

Scottiebill said...

Anon 11:18: You really should come up with a better description of 11:04. Calling him a "moron" and "pathetic loser" only goes to insult morons and pathetic losers.
And if you haven't seen me criticize him for his endless profanities on this blog, Then you haven't been paying attention. But then, with all the Anonymouses posting on here, how does one really know who we, Bobkatt and I, are referring to?

Thanks again, Bobkatt.

El Phantasmo said...

Scottiebill: You're still a hypocrite when it comes to name calling, regardless of Bobkatt's ridiculous justification that says okay to call names for conservatives, but not okay if a supposed "liberal" does it.

Anonymous said...

Hi!

Anonymous said...

One thing that disgusts me about Oregon is the failure of people to get each other's back. That's a product of being born in and living in a civilized society. NML comes in and personally attacks Daniel, and is responded to in a very hostile manner. So what? NML started it. Maybe the Anon wanted to finish it. While not approving of the methods, one might thing that anger and indignation is understood, but that's not a strong Oregon trait, is it? Everyone is holier than thou; everyone thinks they are right; and everyone thinks everyone else is wrong. There is no cohesion here. People in Oregon constantly stab each other in the back. Daniel doesn't do that, so good for him.

El Phantasmo said...

Anon 637,

I don't know... all this over use of the word "attack." Don't you think it's a little dramatic? A diss is one thing, and Daniel's blatant hypocrisy deservers a good dissing, but to characterize a good poke in the ribs as an "attack" just seems a little over the top and melodramatic, if you ask me.
Oh, and I'm thinking that maybe you haven't been visiting this blog for very long if you think Daniel's just a nice guy who receives undeserved criticism. If he can dish it (and he certainly does) then he should be prepared to take it. He constantly whines about state workers but I bet he doesn't whine about her paycheck. It's a valid point. How that translates into an "attack" is a pretty flimsy arguement. Although, the comment about "Mexican senorita lips" wasn't necessary. Maybe a little funny, but not necessary. But, Daniel's never been known to temper his comments about other Mexican ladies, sooooooooo....fair game.
As far as Wee Master Gosuckadick, I'll wager his enthusiastically obscene and imbicilic defense of Miglavs is something Miglavs would rather do without.

Anonymous said...

You may be right about Daniel not wanting the heavy-handed counter attack. Again, this is not "ribbing." You must be the same guy from the other day. It is beyond clear to me that many of you personally attack the man based on his opinions. The only people I see him go after are public figures, almost always politicians or specific political appointees. That comes with the territory. I don't see him on here talking about their spouses/partners, where they live, etc. But I see you guys do that to him. I really think you guys ought to knock off what you are doing. If you disagree with his opinion, then attack the opinion, not the person delivering it. It is beyond question that a favored tactic of the Left is to demean, belittle and label their opponents. You guys do that all day long here. The personal attacks, from any side, shouldn't be tolerated. I ask that you guys back off of each other and stick to the issue at hand. In this case, the subject involves aliens. Stick to that. Let's keep Daniel's personal life out of it; it isn't relevant to the discussion.

NML said...

In THIS case, the topic is state agencies supported by the "fruits of OUR labor." Making Daniel's hypocrisy (since he benefits from a state paycheck) TOTALLY relevant.

Scottiebill said...

ElPhantom; Anyone who you don't agree with is a hypocrite. It is not hypocrisy to come down on public officials that do nothing but push off on their constituents their own self-aggrandizement. Teddy the Useless is a prime example of that self-aggrandizement. I call him "useless" because, as a governor, he is.

You probably have a problem with that, but that is your privilege.

I am glad to see that you dropped the Anonymous handle. That is a small step in the right direction.

Bobkatt said...

NML-by your logic no one who profits from an employer should be allowed to be critical of the employer hiring practices or policies. I wonder if that applies to whistle-blowers? If Daniel's wife does indeed work for the state's retirement division perhaps she has inside knowledge of waste and over staffing.
Unless you have proof that his wife's "ethnicity played a pretty big part in her hiring" then I would say that comment fits the definition of an "attack".

Scottiebill said...

Each state agency should have a cultural competency coordinator? From what I've read and seen in the papers and on TV news, it looks like every government agency in Oregon and Washington State and in Washington D.C. should have a competency coordinator. Forget the cultural part. And that should include the governors in both states and, of course, the U.S. Congress as well.

NML said...

The criteria by which one can arrive at the conclusion that another is a hypocrite is pretty clear. It has nothing to do with whether or not you agree with them, Bobkatt.