Monday, September 29, 2008

As opposed to the anti-Christian sentiment featured daily...

Why are all the Oregon liberals in a tizzy about his video being distributed as an advertisement in Sunday's Oregonian? Richard Dawkins is great for bashing Christians but if a group shows what radical Islam is about we have some sort of "hate mongering?"

Islamists, you would think, would hold the same social positions on abortion, gay marriage, fisting being taugh in the third grade classroom, etc as Christians. So why do liberals insist on defending them? The only position they seem to share is their hatred of America...

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Most Islamists are also against Drugs, Alcohol, public Nudity, Homosexuality, Bikini's or any revealing clothing, most things Liberals are all for.

Yeah so why are they defending them?

Liberals are just stuck in that No Free speech thingy, unless it is their Free speech only of course, as proven by the O again.

Anonymous said...

They claim only a small number of Islamists want Jihad, yet it is their Leaders, that they allow to remain as leaders, who call for Jihad.
IF most didn't want Jihad wouldn't they eliminate their leaders?

We didn't want King George and his Taxes and we got rid of England over 200 years ago with Farmers and pitchforks, so they could if they really want to.

DAVE01 said...

I agree with both of you. I think that most muslims are not actively involved in jihad, however they are doing nothing to stop it. In other words, silence is consent. Look at Europe, they are starting to realize the problems massive amounts of muslims bring to their countries. I hope we wake up before it's too late here.

Anonymous said...

8:39, it's simple. Conservatives don't like Islamofascists so Liberals love them. That's how it works. Do they overtly hate America? No. But the end result of their action ends up being anti-American.

Anything a conservative likes, a radical liberal will not like. Book it.