I really had thought that we had reached a point where unemployment benefits would be extended forever. When"it's for the children" trumps the constitution and how do we pay for it is a consideration for another generation it is refreshing to see Jim Bunning demanding to know where the money is to extend unemployment benefits. (a term that I despise, there should be no "benefit" to being unemployed)
Of course, everyone now calls him heartless which is clearly more important than the issue of "how long should your unemployment INSURANCE last?"
Should it be 3 years? 20 months? Someone on the name calling side throw out a number so that we can hold you to it at some point.