tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post3821229835833009410..comments2024-02-19T00:14:24.293-08:00Comments on Daniel's political musings: News flash: Amazon already did thisDanielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14946233454014389006noreply@blogger.comBlogger41125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-39665210384717716662011-12-13T14:05:41.485-08:002011-12-13T14:05:41.485-08:00"Ever notice how alll [sic] fire departments ...<i>"Ever notice how alll </i>[sic]<i> fire departments are primarily white?"</i><br /><br />Can't say that I have.<br /><br />While we're on the subject, have you noticed how all OWS "protests" are primarily white?FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-3021793597342906362011-12-12T18:56:53.104-08:002011-12-12T18:56:53.104-08:00Ever notice how alll fire departments are primaril...Ever notice how alll fire departments are primarily white? Ocassional token non-white here or there, but it seems obvious they reserve these soft easy money spots for those who fit their ideal for their "fraternity".<br />And the pay/benefit package!!! This is an industry which needs privitization, let alone austerity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-55177213503731619462011-11-08T08:38:13.871-08:002011-11-08T08:38:13.871-08:00It's good that you acknowledge your attacks ar...It's good that you acknowledge your attacks are tired and worn out.<br /><br />Admitting your faults is the first step toward recovery.FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-28453420313100414042011-11-08T06:36:56.312-08:002011-11-08T06:36:56.312-08:00FP, if you're thinking that my "same old ...FP, if you're thinking that my "same old tired attacks" are somehow in contrast with your propensity for trailblazing originality, try thinking again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-17998400039363714512011-11-07T22:16:58.447-08:002011-11-07T22:16:58.447-08:00You scummy little racist republican weasils.You scummy little racist republican weasils.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-14493695101003003092011-11-07T13:10:33.407-08:002011-11-07T13:10:33.407-08:00I love it when you use the same old tired attacks ...I love it when you use the same old <i>tired</i> attacks out of your <i>musty</i> playbook, which is so <i>common</i> with your side. Your <i>banality</i> never fails to amuse me.<br /><br />Makes my day.FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-80202723101403204902011-11-07T09:27:28.205-08:002011-11-07T09:27:28.205-08:00I love it when FP uses the word "bromides.&qu...I love it when FP uses the word "bromides." :-DAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-32459001891206522502011-11-06T11:07:35.844-08:002011-11-06T11:07:35.844-08:00Why is BBC legit and Fox isn't? What makes yo...Why is BBC legit and Fox isn't? What makes you the decider of 'legitness'?DAVE01noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-56252008199035316072011-11-05T11:33:25.559-07:002011-11-05T11:33:25.559-07:00Let it never be said that an "anon" didn...Let it never be said that an "anon" didn't fess up to a mistake... and then rush to justify itself by lobbing more bromides against it's opponent in a feeble effort to make itself feel better about making such amateuruish mistakes in the first place.<br /><br />Stay humble, my friend.FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-10601998108670008172011-11-05T05:34:15.700-07:002011-11-05T05:34:15.700-07:00Hey idiots! Wake up!
Librarians don't make &q...Hey idiots! Wake up!<br /><br />Librarians don't make "about $100K a year," and, more crucially, they don't pull "facts" out of their asses. See, that's what's up with youse--you act/judge/vote/rant based on a shitload of bogus assumptions.<br /><br />And in so doing, you manage to screw *yourselves* by fighting against the wrong damn enemies.<br /><br />News flash: You're not among the One Percent, and likely never will be. Not even close. Wake up and recognize who's truly vacuuming up the money.<br /><br />Then your local Occupiers will welcome your energy with open arms, guaranteed.<br /><br />FYI: <br />http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Librarian/SalaryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-55223925186421278032011-11-04T17:32:46.690-07:002011-11-04T17:32:46.690-07:00One thing about fox, they don't have a tingle ...<i>One thing about fox, they don't have a tingle down their leg for the destroyer in chief...</i><br /><br />...unless he's a Republican.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-26064308577236508262011-11-04T16:08:03.254-07:002011-11-04T16:08:03.254-07:001) Let it never be said an "Anon" didn&#...1) Let it never be said an "Anon" didn't fess up to a mistake. FP, you're right: I called out Dave for assuming he knows what I watch, while at the same time making an assumption about what you watch. <br /><br />2) However: <i>You</i> rushed to the defense of FOX News; I didn't even mention CNN or Rachel Maddow.<br /><br />3) The above does not change "haughty" charge, which is fine with me. Embrace it, celebrate it ... oh wait, you already do that. <br /><br />4) Dave: I don't watch television news. For best business news, the Wall Street Journal; for foreign news (and, actually, some domestic news) I think BBC radio is the best.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-41263816441722321482011-11-04T15:16:06.077-07:002011-11-04T15:16:06.077-07:00I'm simply asking what you think is a 'leg...I'm simply asking what you think is a 'legit' news show? I mostly watch fox and cnn in the mornings for a few minutes and most of the news I get is on the internet. One thing about fox, they don't have a tingle down their leg for the destroyer in chief. That gives them a lot more credibility than any other 'legit' news organization.<br /><br />What kind of person would be scared by having the news given to them unless it was another attack. Yes fox tells its viewers that obama has terrorist and racist friends. That is the truth. Can you dispute that. Hannity keeps harping on that. I get tired of hearing that too. We all know that and the Americans that voted for obama don't care.<br /><br />I saw rachel maddow the first time a few months ago and caught her in a lie in a few seconds. I listened a few more minutes and couldn't handle her lies and bias and bigotry and general bullshit.<br /><br />According to you, which news organization is 'legit"?DAVE01noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-11881238686435735912011-11-04T14:04:12.225-07:002011-11-04T14:04:12.225-07:00Yes! More bromides, name-calling, and presumptuous...Yes! More bromides, name-calling, and presumptuousness from the foremost authority on blather, Anonymous! For in one statement he/she/it says:<br /><br /><i>...an idiot who gets his "news" from a station that has as its mission scaring the living daylights out of people. There's a reason that FOX "News" viewers are vastly less informed than those who don't.</i><br /><br />Then this:<br /><br /><i>Is there anything else you'd like to assume about me that isn't true? Like what I have for breakfast? My favorite color? Who I voted for? (It wasn't Obama) Go for it. Knock yourself out. Right now, you're batting .000, so you can only go up.</i><br /><br />Verdict?<br /><br /><i>'Nuff said.</i>FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-37378684646610327382011-11-04T12:37:04.258-07:002011-11-04T12:37:04.258-07:00Dave, I've never seen/heard Rachel Maddow and,...Dave, I've never seen/heard Rachel Maddow and, in fact, could not even tell you which network she's on, or for that matter, if she's radio or TV. I have literally <i>never</i> heard her, anywhere. If she were part of a police lineup, I would not be able to identify her, unless I had a lucky guess. <br /><br />As for CNN, I haven't watched it with any regularity since Bernard Shaw was the anchor, and the last time I even saw it was at a relative's house when they had it tuned to CNN when those Chilean miners were trapped underground. I will confess to possibly having glimpsed it in the last few years while walking through airports. <br /><br />Is there anything else you'd like to assume about me that isn't true? Like what I have for breakfast? My favorite color? Who I voted for? (It wasn't Obama) Go for it. Knock yourself out. Right now, you're batting .000, so you can only go up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-10411278600956767392011-11-04T12:27:43.902-07:002011-11-04T12:27:43.902-07:00I looked up "unoriginal" and it said ANO...I looked up "unoriginal" and it said ANON 8:57 AM.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-28572509882475574872011-11-04T08:57:03.836-07:002011-11-04T08:57:03.836-07:00I looked up idiot and it said ANON 7:46 AM.I looked up idiot and it said ANON 7:46 AM.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-80338541251069803362011-11-04T08:54:54.426-07:002011-11-04T08:54:54.426-07:00Which news organization do you call "legitima...Which news organization do you call "legitimate" if FOX is not? If you are talking about channels like CNN, I don't think you know what a news show is. <br /><br />I saw on CNN the other day about the gun running to mexican drug gangs that obama did. I think it was Anderson Cooper, he just about said it was all Bush's fault. For anyone who has followed the massive crimes committed and the deaths caused by obama, holder, napalotino and clinton I laughed at his bullshit. For the uneducated who only watch CNN, they would think it was all Bush's fault. Of course cooper can't help but be a liar and mouthpiece for the destroyer in the white hut. Cooper had some idiot on the show who was clearly biased against republicans and bush. He didnt' mention that Bush's administration stopped or called the mexicans after guns accidentally went over the border and the mexicans didn't show up to grab them, the program was immediately stopped. Under obama, they wanted the guns to go south so they would show up at murder scenes. <br /><br />Hundreds and maybe thousands of dead people with many more to come. They are willing to sacrifice your family member to get their anti second amendment agenda passed to violate American civil rights. I'm glad you voted for the criminal and murderer in chief. May your family and friends experience what Terry, Jaime and over two hundred mexicans experienced because of obama from the american paid for and american supplied guns to mexican terrorists. Obama and company are directly supplying mexicans terrorists with military grade weapons and explosives. One additional bonus in obama's plan is to destabilize the mexican government. I don't think most countries would want to be a friend of obama's. He will kill you and your people to get his agenda.<br /><br />Obama and company, such wonderful folks.<br /><br />LOL, a 'legit' news organization. You are such a fool. Don't forget rachel maddow, she's an idiot too. Why do the liberals have such idiots and liars as their 'legit' news source.DAVE01noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-74881632776871872412011-11-04T07:46:09.812-07:002011-11-04T07:46:09.812-07:00I looked up "haughty" in the dictionary,...I looked up "haughty" in the dictionary, and it says, "See FP's comments at Daniel's Political Musings."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-79039999696100151802011-11-03T13:25:15.370-07:002011-11-03T13:25:15.370-07:00Fairly lengthy post, FP. A lot of words. Specific...Fairly lengthy post, FP. A lot of words. Specifically, a lot of words hanging on the premise that "FOX" is a legitimate news gathering organization.<br /><br />You don't see the problem there, do you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-75824595797222514522011-11-03T12:01:12.657-07:002011-11-03T12:01:12.657-07:00Blather about "scare quotes" from an idi...Blather about "scare quotes" from an idiot who gets his "news" from a station that has as its mission scaring the living daylights out of people. There's a reason that FOX "News" viewers are vastly less informed than those who don't. 'Nuff said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-89457618986160107322011-11-02T22:04:11.131-07:002011-11-02T22:04:11.131-07:00Totally. The only way they possibly squeeze any mo...<i>Totally. The only way they possibly squeeze any more red white and blue into the screen is if they face-painted the anchors like fans at the Super Bowl.</i><br /><br />Knowledge no doubt gleaned from your near-religious devotion to monitoring Fox news. What other way would you know about an American company having the gall to show American colors to an American audience? The nerve of them!<br /><br /><i>I suspect that academic studies have revealed streaks of racism in FOX coverage, but <b>since I can't point to any</b>, I'll pass on this one. Hell, I'll even give it to you: I'm sure FOX anchors aren't racist any more than Daniel Miglavs is... </i><br /><br />And now, a quote from you from the previous thread:<br /><br /><i>You got nothing, buddy. Nothing.</i><br /><br />Oops! <br /><br /><i>As long as it's a white Republican "Christian" who professes to be fighting a war on terror. Now, if you're black and a Democrat, watch your ass!</i><br /><br />Love the scare quotes. But what if it's a Democrat <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/21/obama_31/" rel="nofollow">"Christian"</a> (or is that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M&feature=search" rel="nofollow">"Muslim"</a>?) who is continuing the previous administration's policies regarding the war on terror, with a couple extra wars tossed in for good measure? Oh, silly me; I forgot: All’s fair in love and war. You love wars conducted by Democrats. "Christian" or not.<br /><br /><i>So long as its accomplished in the name of "free markets" and red white and blue capitalism.</i><br /><br />Again, love the scare quotes. Free markets are so scary. And of course, capitalism of the red, white, & blue variety is so passé. Crony capitalism is what's chic in Washington right now.<br /><br /><i> Hell, why not?. Unless, of course, you're with the Tea Party.</i><br /><br />Good for you, getting your news from real journalists like Jon Stewart, instead of comedic hacks like Jay Leno and Conan O’Brien.<br /><br />You make me proud.FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-43160721384412221742011-11-01T15:20:18.616-07:002011-11-01T15:20:18.616-07:00...exalting nation
Totally. The only way they pos...<i>...exalting nation</i><br /><br />Totally. The only way they possibly squeeze any more red white and blue into the screen is if they face-painted the anchors like fans at the Super Bowl.<br /><br /><i> ...and often race above the individual.</i><br /><br />I suspect that academic studies have revealed streaks of racism in FOX coverage, but since I can't point to any, I'll pass on this one. Hell, I'll even give it to you: I'm sure FOX anchors aren't racist any more than Daniel Miglavs is ... and everybody knows that Daniel isn't racist. :-)<br /><br /><i> We all know that Fox News stands for a centralized, autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader,</i><br /><br />As long as it's a white Republican "Christian" who professes to be fighting a war on terror. Now, if you're black and a Democrat, watch your ass!<br /><br /><i> .. severe economic and social regimentation ...</i><br /><br />So long as its accomplished in the name of "free markets" and red white and blue capitalism.<br /><br /><i> and forcible suppression of opposition.</i><br /><br />Hell, why not?. Unless, of course, you're with the <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/06/jon-stewart-compares-coverage-of-occupy-wall-street-and-the-tea-party/" rel="nofollow">Tea Party</a>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-19539703585655251412011-11-01T13:41:06.790-07:002011-11-01T13:41:06.790-07:00Yup... Fox News, exalting nation and often race ab...Yup... Fox News, exalting nation and often race above the individual. We all know that Fox News stands for a centralized, autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.<br /><br />A news network. ONE news network out of many. A non-government owned entity.<br /><br />Only in anonymousland.FPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-62192490030689688352011-11-01T12:21:53.766-07:002011-11-01T12:21:53.766-07:00Whoops, my mistake. "Occassionally" swim...Whoops, my mistake. "Occassionally" swimming against the tide. ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com