tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post113623136425970520..comments2024-02-19T00:14:24.293-08:00Comments on Daniel's political musings: They're gay but not happyDanielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14946233454014389006noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136407564929429242006-01-04T12:46:00.000-08:002006-01-04T12:46:00.000-08:00I am going to keep this basic. I just want these ...I am going to keep this basic. I just want these BRO people to STFU. I am farking tired of their bullsheise. It's just too much. These people are in your face all the time. When they aren't in my face with their agenda, it's cool. I don't care if they are gay or what they do. I just don't want gay "sensivity" taught to 5th graders, as CDC suggests be done in their human sexuality manuals. Just STFU already!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136404648443455272006-01-04T11:57:00.000-08:002006-01-04T11:57:00.000-08:00Us BLACK people VOMIT, when we here the GAY RIGHTS...Us BLACK people VOMIT, when we here the GAY RIGHTS crap being pushed. GAYS are NOT a minority per se. YES there are less of them, that is because of nature, because you don't make babies having ANAL SEX, instead, you transmit disease. Therefore they will always be a physical minority (good). BUT they are not BLACK/EX-SLAVES etc.<BR/>PERVERTS do not deserve any special "US ONLY" rights!<BR/>And the constant push for such is making many of us resentful and some nasty backlash can be expected if they don't SHUT UP & just live and have all the SEX you sickos want, PRIVATELY! BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN is nothing but propaganda and it aint gonna work either!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136319984341289142006-01-03T12:26:00.000-08:002006-01-03T12:26:00.000-08:00What is the goal of the movement? - Tolerance - I...What is the goal of the movement? <BR/> - Tolerance - I don't think so<BR/> - Acceptance - Currently<BR/> - Normalization - Ultimately<BR/><BR/>Tolerance, which BTW is intolerant, is the live and let live goal. Kinda like a neighbor you don't like - you ignore them, they ignore you and everyone is happy.<BR/><BR/>Acceptance means your kids play with their kids, you will talk with them at social times. <BR/><BR/>Unwed mothers went thru this. Before WWII, it was normal to ignore those women/families - getting pregnant while not married was 'horrible'. <BR/>(truly the men who knocked them up were equally bad, just harder to detect - and those who were widows still were known as Mrs.)Then after WWII and Korea - the number of single women with children increased due to the wars - asking was impolite and with the social changes - unmarried mothers became accepted.<BR/>(Now they are the norm - given how many in the population are raised by single moms) <BR/><BR/>Being normal does not mean it is best -- just so common you no longer think that they are different.<BR/><BR/>GLBTQ - want to be accepted - different but like us - and then they will want normalization - where you stop thinking they are different.<BR/><BR/>To achieve this last goal, they will have to get Christians, Jews and Muslims to stop having their views on the subject being: normal/accepted/tolerated.<BR/><BR/>Take a look at Europe - how influential is religious belief?<BR/>I heard a stat which I don't know if it is true - but that there are more Muslims in England ( 3% of the population) than there are Christians in church on a [regular] Sunday.<BR/><BR/>If we'd just get rid of those pesky religous beliefs, then we can all just get along. < /sarcasim >Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136316876615822152006-01-03T11:34:00.000-08:002006-01-03T11:34:00.000-08:00No, pretty much fully agreed, actually (though I t...No, pretty much fully agreed, actually (though I think you'll find that this sort of "gay supremacy" philosophy hardly represents homosexuals as a whole). I say again: just give them what they need for equality. All you'd really need is a court ruling to affirm that discrimination based on sexuality is prohibited by the fourteenth Amendment; expand the Uniform Code to let them serve in the military; and just give them the bloody marriage rights (call it a "civil union" if it'll make you feel better). Affirm those rights, and 90% of them will shut up, because equality, believe it or not, is the only thing they want. The other 10% that Daniel's decided to showcase here will end up on the path of the KKK and the Bolshevists; I'm sure you'll see to that.Kaelrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14736094826717725347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136268264473824642006-01-02T22:04:00.000-08:002006-01-02T22:04:00.000-08:00Yeah, our constitution is now considered a suicide...Yeah, our constitution is now considered a suicide pact.Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14946233454014389006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136264650979832662006-01-02T21:04:00.000-08:002006-01-02T21:04:00.000-08:00"Oregon ADA prohibits discrimination against peopl..."Oregon ADA prohibits discrimination against people with a gender-related diagnosis, requires no reasonable accommodation"<BR/><BR/> Hell, the FEDERAL ADA mandates criminally insane people be guranteed reasonable accommodation.<BR/><BR/> "Is there a message here?"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136260487531147912006-01-02T19:54:00.000-08:002006-01-02T19:54:00.000-08:00Let's take the language back from the homo Libs.#1...Let's take the language back from the homo Libs.<BR/><BR/>#1 Gay means Happy!<BR/><BR/>#2 Queers aren't happy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136251542469287332006-01-02T17:25:00.000-08:002006-01-02T17:25:00.000-08:00So give 'em the anti-discrimination laws. The lack...So give 'em the anti-discrimination laws. The lack thereof is the only grounds they have for complaint.Kaelrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14736094826717725347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136244112579450012006-01-02T15:21:00.000-08:002006-01-02T15:21:00.000-08:00I think anonymous is on point, here. I don't run ...I think anonymous is on point, here. I don't run around hollering "Hey look at me!" - which seems to be a mainstay of homosexual conduct in general.<BR/><BR/>I know I'm way tired of hearing how oppressed they are.MAX Redlinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12040240474444763721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136239695496498442006-01-02T14:08:00.000-08:002006-01-02T14:08:00.000-08:00I think the gay rights movement has "shot it's wad...I think the gay rights movement has "shot it's wad" so to speak. Personally I think the average citizen is sick of hearing how oppressed gays are, when the reality is otherwise.<BR/><BR/>Fine, people should not be beaten up or fired because they are gay, nor should gays be refused to be allowed to love whoever they wish to love. Besides that, I think most people could care less about the whole thing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136238481837424802006-01-02T13:48:00.000-08:002006-01-02T13:48:00.000-08:00"Why should public (read:taxpayers) have to supply...<I>"Why should public (read:taxpayers) have to supply equal benfits for same sex domestic partners? Why not opposite sex domestic partners? Isnt' that discriminatory?"</I><BR/><BR/>"Equal," I think, meaning equal to opposite-sex partners. Mutually inclusive.<BR/><BR/><I>"But I dont' think that the people (you know, the government) want to have their tax dollars used for same-sex benefits. I know that I don't."</I><BR/><BR/>"<A HREF="http://communicationsoffice.tripod.com/3-06.txt" REL="nofollow">I don't know</A> <BR/>where you get the idea that taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for anything of which they <BR/>disapprove. Lots of 'em don't like tanks. Even more don't like Congress."<BR/><BR/><I>"And "gender related diagnosis" is pretty broad. Are we talking "gender dysphoria" where something thinks they are a woman when they are really a man?"</I><BR/><BR/>Either way, I expect BRO has a realistic idea of what kind of "diagnosis" they could get away with defending.Kaelrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14736094826717725347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136235599941828382006-01-02T12:59:00.000-08:002006-01-02T12:59:00.000-08:00Again, your quoting the PR firm. But I do contest ...Again, your quoting the PR firm. But I do contest some of those items:<BR/><BR/>Why should public (read:taxpayers) have to supply equal benfits for same sex domestic partners? Why not opposite sex domestic partners? Isnt' that discriminatory?<BR/><BR/>But I dont' think that the people (you know, the government) want to have their tax dollars used for same-sex benefits. I know that I don't.<BR/><BR/>And "gender related diagnosis" is pretty broad. Are we talking "gender dysphoria" where something thinks they are a woman when they are really a man?<BR/><BR/>Someone like that is very disturbed.Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14946233454014389006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11266150.post-1136234709860656452006-01-02T12:45:00.000-08:002006-01-02T12:45:00.000-08:00Ick."Illegal to discriminate on the basis of sexua...<A HREF="http://www.basicrights.org/issues/legalrights.asp" REL="nofollow">Ick</A>.<BR/><BR/><I>"Illegal to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in both private and public (non-federal) employment."</I><BR/><BR/>*shudder*<BR/><BR/><I>"Public (non-federal) employers must offer equal benefits for same-sex domestic partners"</I><BR/><BR/>Very dangerous language.<BR/><BR/><I>"Oregon ADA prohibits discrimination against people with a gender-related diagnosis, requires no reasonable accommodation"</I><BR/><BR/>This must be stopped.Kaelrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14736094826717725347noreply@blogger.com